Loving vs. Virgina - 783 Words

LOVING v. VIRGINIA Can you imagine not being able to share your life with the person you love because of the color of your skin? Well, this was the case for those who resided in Virginia decades ago. Interracial marriages were not allowed in Virginia and sixteen other states due to the adoption of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The sole purpose of this act was to completely prohibit a white person marrying other than another white person. Marriage licenses were not issued until the issuing official is content with the applications statements as to if their races are correct. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, was not going to let the state of Virginia stop them from being married, so they left†¦show more content†¦Some states actually banished interracial couples from their homelands. With the growing racial unrest sweeping the U.S., and particularly the South in the 1960s, The Supreme Court decided that the protections of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Con stitution applied equally to blacks and the whites that loved them. The Loving vs. Virginia case ended the abominable assumption that the state has a right to intrude upon the private lives and affections of its citizens, to the point of dictating to them who they were allowed to love. Mildred Loving is alone now, the marriage that entered her name in law school textbooks ended in 1975 when a drunken driver broad sided the couples car and killed her husband. She lives quietly in a small cinderblock house Richard Loving built for her and three children after the Supreme Court decision allowed them to return to Virginia. Mildred and Richard loving did not want to overturn Virginias anti-miscegenation law; they just wanted to get married. Bibliography www.law.umkc.edu www.personl.umich.eduShow MoreRelatedInterracial Issues Among Marriage, And Criminal Prosecution Between The 1800s And The 1900s934 Words   |  4 Pageswill discuss the interracial issues among marriage, and criminal prosecution between the 1800s and the 1900s. Throughout the period of inequality there were many cases dealing with the crime of racial relationships. One of many was the case of lovings vs. virgina. The main problem if the case was the fact that a white man was married to a black woman. During this period of time that was crime, because people saw blacks as low class people and uneducated. However different states believed it to be a crimeRead MoreSocial Imagination579 Words   |  3 Pagesavidly argue Same Sex Marriage must be passed to make us adhere to the constitution that â€Å"All men are created equal† One group is not MORE equal than another and we all have the same rights. There was actually a landmark constitutional case, â€Å"Loving vs. Virgina† An interracial couple sued the state of Virginia as it was illegal at the time for interracial marriage and a couple was jailed for one year in Virginia for their marriage which was a violation of the Racial Integrity act of 1924. The SupremeRead More Vie ws on Gay Marriage in Anna Quindlin’s Essay Evan’s Two Moms1164 Words   |  5 Pagestrusting, knowledgeable and intelligent by providing the reader with specific court cases to support her argument. In the body, logos is also interconnected with ethos. For example, Quindlen uses the court case of Loving v. Virginia to show that gay marriage works in the same way. In this case Loving and his wife were banned from living in the state of Virginia because the couple was a mix of black and white. Just like a gay couple, they are banned from getting married because they are of the same race.Read MoreMarriage Inequality in America Spotlighting Equal Rights for the LGBT Community1911 Words   |  8 Pageshave addressed the issues regarding sections of the Constitution of Virginia that currently ban same-sex unions and completely negate all acknowledgments of such unions that may have taken place in a state where it was legal (General Assembly of Virgina, 2014). In Virginia and many other states that have not legalized gay marriage the complexities of this argument are more heavily debated, but in those who have accepted equal marriage rights the debate remains spotlighted because other states, like